EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/94.lightwave-08/000134_owner-lightwave-l _Wed Aug 3 22:06:44 1994.msg

Internet Message Format | 1994-09-05 | 2KB

Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by netcom10.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom)     id VAA08309; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 21:50:46 -0700
Received: by netcom10.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom)     id VAA08296; Wed, 3 Aug 1994 21:50:41 -0700
From: djmccoy (Daniel J. McCoy)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Subject: Return Addresses and Replies
To: [e-mail]
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 1994 21:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1070
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [e-mail]

While the controversy still looms overhead as to what exactly should be the
return address of messages (mailing list or originator's address), I should
point out that most mailers have the ability to display a message's full
header.  The originator's e-mail address should be found after "From: ".
With that information, you can respond to the originator when you need to.

Also, some e-mail that originates on Netcom from people on the list tied
into Netcom may not have "@netcom.com" appended to the e-mail address.  If
you see a message from someone with no domain, it's more than likely a
message that originated on Netcom.  I THINK this can be taken care of (at
least this is what Netcom support people tell me) by those of us on Netcom
sending to "[e-mail]" instead of just "lightwave-l".

Thanks and keep on rendering.
Dan
--
Daniel J. McCoy                                                       //
Internet : [e-mail] or [e-mail]      \X/
Portal   : Daniel J McCoy        BIX: dmccoy                       Amiga